Overview

Request 967551 accepted

- Update to TeXLive 2022 (boo#1188577)
- Remove patch source-missed-scripts.dif as scripts now are upstream
- Remove patch source-r58686:r58919.dif as obsolete

Loading...

Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

nothing provides texlive-Suggests: needed by texlive-latex

(there are a few more like this, all seem to miss texlive-Suggests)


Dr. Werner Fink's avatar

Args ... that looks like a script error as this should be, e.g.

Suggests: texlive-usebib-doc

and not

Requires: texlive-Suggests: texlive-usebib-doc

that should not be prefixed by Requires: texlive- ... was the fix for boo#1197367

... fixed perl script is running ... will take a while



Dr. Werner Fink's avatar

Should be done now


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

Current installcheck failures reported:

can't install texlive-authorarchive-2022.191.1.1.1svn54512-1.1.noarch:
nothing provides tex(dtk-logos.sty) needed by texlive-authorarchive-2022.191.1.1.1svn54512.noarch

can't install texlive-collection-latexextra-2022.190.svn62901-1.1.noarch:
package texlive-collection-latexextra-2022.190.svn62901.noarch requires texlive-authorarchive >= 2022, but none of the providers can be installed
nothing provides tex(dtk-logos.sty) needed by texlive-authorarchive-2022.191.1.1.1svn54512.noarch

can't install texlive-collection-luatex-2022.190.svn62829-1.1.noarch:
package texlive-collection-luatex-2022.190.svn62829.noarch requires texlive-luakeys >= 2022, but none of the providers can be installed
nothing provides tex(luakeys-debug.tex) needed by texlive-luakeys-2022.191.0.0.5svn62904.noarch

can't install texlive-luakeys-2022.191.0.0.5svn62904-1.1.noarch:
nothing provides tex(luakeys-debug.tex) needed by texlive-luakeys-2022.191.0.0.5svn62904.noarch

can't install texlive-scheme-full-2022.190.svn54074-1.1.noarch:
package texlive-scheme-full-2022.190.svn54074.noarch requires texlive-collection-latexextra >= 2022, but none of the providers can be installed
package texlive-collection-latexextra-2022.190.svn62901.noarch requires texlive-authorarchive >= 2022, but none of the providers can be installed
nothing provides tex(dtk-logos.sty) needed by texlive-authorarchive-2022.191.1.1.1svn54512.noarch

can't install texlive-scheme-medium-2022.190.svn54074-1.1.noarch:
package texlive-scheme-medium-2022.190.svn54074.noarch requires texlive-collection-luatex >= 2022, but none of the providers can be installed
package texlive-collection-luatex-2022.190.svn62829.noarch requires texlive-luakeys >= 2022, but none of the providers can be installed
nothing provides tex(luakeys-debug.tex) needed by texlive-luakeys-2022.191.0.0.5svn62904.noarch


Dr. Werner Fink's avatar

OK ... moved the two used files from doc tree into usedx tree ... build is running


Dr. Werner Fink's avatar

SR#970731 and SR#970732


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

Things moved a bit, current installcheck failure reported are:

can't install texlive-authorarchive-2022.191.1.1.1svn54512-1.1.noarch:
nothing provides tex(dtk-logos.sty) needed by texlive-authorarchive-2022.191.1.1.1svn54512.noarch

can't install texlive-collection-latexextra-2022.190.svn62901-1.1.noarch:
package texlive-collection-latexextra-2022.190.svn62901.noarch requires texlive-authorarchive >= 2022, but none of the providers can be installed
nothing provides tex(dtk-logos.sty) needed by texlive-authorarchive-2022.191.1.1.1svn54512.noarch

can't install texlive-scheme-full-2022.190.svn54074-1.1.noarch:
package texlive-scheme-full-2022.190.svn54074.noarch requires texlive-collection-latexextra >= 2022, but none of the providers can be installed
package texlive-collection-latexextra-2022.190.svn62901.noarch requires texlive-authorarchive >= 2022, but none of the providers can be installed
nothing provides tex(dtk-logos.sty) needed by texlive-authorarchive-2022.191.1.1.1svn54512.noarch

Dr. Werner Fink's avatar

Hmmm .... the subpackage texlive-dtk from texlive-specs-g.spec does have the tag

Provides:       tex(dtk-logos.sty)

as well as in the file list

%files -n texlive-dtk
%defattr(-,root,root,755)
%{_texmfdistdir}/tex/latex/dtk/dtk-author.clo
%{_texmfdistdir}/tex/latex/dtk/dtk-extern.sty
%{_texmfdistdir}/tex/latex/dtk/dtk-full.clo
%{_texmfdistdir}/tex/latex/dtk/dtk-logos.sty

Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

Not in the texlive-specs-g which I have here (in staging:L):

%files -n texlive-dtk
%defattr(-,root,root,755)
%{_texmfdistdir}/tex/latex/dtk/dtk-author.clo
%{_texmfdistdir}/tex/latex/dtk/dtk-extern.sty
%{_texmfdistdir}/tex/latex/dtk/dtk-full.clo
%{_texmfdistdir}/tex/latex/dtk/dtk-new-engines.clo
%{_texmfdistdir}/tex/latex/dtk/dtk-old-engines.clo
%{_texmfdistdir}/tex/latex/dtk/dtk-url.sty
%{_texmfdistdir}/tex/latex/dtk/dtk.bbx
%{_texmfdistdir}/tex/latex/dtk/dtk.cbx
%{_texmfdistdir}/tex/latex/dtk/dtk.cls
%{_texmfdistdir}/tex/latex/dtk/dtk.dbx
…

%files -n texlive-dtk-bibliography
%defattr(-,root,root,755)
%{_texmfdistdir}/tex/latex/dtk/dtk-logos.sty

and nowhere a relevant Provides in the spec file:

osc cat openSUSE:Factory:Staging:L texlive-specs-g texlive-specs-g.spec

Request History
Dr. Werner Fink's avatar

WernerFink created request

- Update to TeXLive 2022 (boo#1188577)
- Remove patch source-missed-scripts.dif as scripts now are upstream
- Remove patch source-r58686:r58919.dif as obsolete


Factory Auto's avatar

factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer

Please review sources


Factory Auto's avatar

factory-auto accepted review

Check script succeeded


Saul Goodman's avatar

licensedigger accepted review

The legal review is accepted preliminary. The package may require actions later on.


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

dimstar_suse set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:E as a staging project

Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:E"


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

dimstar_suse accepted review

Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:E"


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

dimstar_suse added factory-staging as a reviewer

Being evaluated by group "factory-staging"


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

dimstar_suse accepted review

Unstaged from project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:E"


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

dimstar_suse set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:L as a staging project

Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:L"


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

dimstar_suse accepted review

Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:L"


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

dimstar accepted review

ok


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

dimstar_suse accepted review

Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:L got accepted.


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

dimstar_suse approved review

Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:L got accepted.


Dominique Leuenberger's avatar

dimstar_suse accepted request

Staging Project openSUSE:Factory:Staging:L got accepted.

openSUSE Build Service is sponsored by