Overview
Request 955931 superseded
- Update branding-tumbleweed.zip from https://github.com/openSUSE/branding.git
Drop plymouth-branding-openSUSE's watermark link add a
configuration function to plymouth theme configuration to avoid
logo lost which cause plymouth to fail.
- Update branding-openSUSE.spec: resort plymouth-branding-openSUSE
install and build dependence to avoid plymouth fall to terminal
mode in some scenario(bsc#1189613).
- Drop systemd icons, since distribution-logos took that over
- Change the name of the font used in the installer
- Created by hellcp
- In state superseded
- Superseded by 955960
-
Open review for
opensuse-review-team
-
Open review for
factory-staging
Request History
hellcp created request
- Update branding-tumbleweed.zip from https://github.com/openSUSE/branding.git
Drop plymouth-branding-openSUSE's watermark link add a
configuration function to plymouth theme configuration to avoid
logo lost which cause plymouth to fail.
- Update branding-openSUSE.spec: resort plymouth-branding-openSUSE
install and build dependence to avoid plymouth fall to terminal
mode in some scenario(bsc#1189613).
- Drop systemd icons, since distribution-logos took that over
- Change the name of the font used in the installer
licensedigger accepted review
ok
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
dimstar_suse set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:D as a staging project
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:D"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Picked "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:D"
dimstar declined review
I declined this 4 months ago with
[ 4s] plymouth-branding-openSUSE-84.87.20210########################################
[ 4s] error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/share/plymouth/plymouthd.defaults;61e03de9: cpio: open failed - No such file or directory
[ 4s] error: plymouth-branding-openSUSE-84.87.20210910-1.1.noarch: install failed
You can;'t ghost own a directory (thus, have metadata that this package should not create the directory, just own it) and in the same package expect to be able to install files to this directory
What makes you believe this is no longer true?
dimstar declined request
I declined this 4 months ago with
[ 4s] plymouth-branding-openSUSE-84.87.20210########################################
[ 4s] error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/share/plymouth/plymouthd.defaults;61e03de9: cpio: open failed - No such file or directory
[ 4s] error: plymouth-branding-openSUSE-84.87.20210910-1.1.noarch: install failed
You can;'t ghost own a directory (thus, have metadata that this package should not create the directory, just own it) and in the same package expect to be able to install files to this directory
What makes you believe this is no longer true?
dimstar_suse reopened request
Reopened via staging workflow.
dimstar_suse added factory-staging as a reviewer
Being evaluated by group "factory-staging"
dimstar_suse declined request
Declined via staging workflow.
dimstar_suse accepted review
Unstaged from project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:D"
