Request 925475 (accepted)

Overview

Request 925475 accepted

No description set

Created by weberho over 2 years ago
In state accepted

Submit coturn

Comments for request 925475 3

Michael Ströder (stroeder) - over 2 years ago

source maintainer

No ticket is referenced and info is pretty sparse. So it's hard to tell which problem shall be solved by this change.

Before this gets accepted I'd like to know what "other device acceess is needed" really means.

Johannes Segitz (jsegitz) - over 2 years ago

There's no ticket for this. ProtectClock not only limits access to the clock, but apparently also to other devices. This was noticed by other packagers. If this doesn't cause issues for you then I'm fine to revoke it, as keeping ProtectClock is preferable

Michael Ströder (stroeder) - over 2 years ago

source maintainer

Yes, as stated in systemd.exec(5) ProtectClock=yes also implies DeviceAllow=char-rtc r which might cause issues for other services.

But I'm heavily using a self-hosted coturn installation based on this package. ProtectClock=yes in coturn.service works for me thus I will restore it.

Could you please revoke this submission? I'm not authorized to revoke it.