Overview
Request 808983 accepted
Streamlined package as suggested by scarabeus_iv
- Created by thomas-schraitle
- In state accepted
-
Package maintainer:
thomas-schraitle
- Supersedes 808958
Why do you need so many sphinx variants, can't the package build with just python3-Sphinx? Also shipping so many docs really does not make sense if upstream has them available online, keep in mind this gets shipped on all computers that fetch the package, thus the warning we put in the rpmlint.
Thanks for the comments. :-)
Why do you need so many sphinx variants, can't the package build with just python3-Sphinx?
My idea was to provide also a Python2 version. Although it's not so important anymore these days, would it hurt? ;)
Also shipping so many docs really does not make sense if upstream has them available online,
Well, sure technically I could remove the docs. However, there is currently no ReadTheDocs instance. The upstream project only has a docs folder, so it's not so nice to read. As the doc here is really not big, I thought I provide that. If you think, this should go into a subpackage, I can do that.
Yea we plan to have multi-python-3 so py3.6 py3.7... and you need sphinx just once -> python3-Sphinx.
We should probably provide some namespace like Sphinx and have all peepz just say BuildRequires: Sphinx, because you don't really need the import modules, you just wanna have any Sphinx.
For the docs I guess we can keep them together, but I would really say the extra space usage is not worht it.
Oh I see, you mean I should reduce it to just the python3 Sphinx. Ahh, clever! :))
Ok, if you think it's not worth it, I'll remove it.
If you wanna just keep it and remove the rpmlint so it is not hidden if someone later complains it takes a lot of spec.
Request History
thomas-schraitle created request
Streamlined package as suggested by scarabeus_iv
scarabeus_iv accepted request
