Depends on python-flake8-import-order sr#596734 and python-flake8-future-import sr#596741.

I replied to this on factory but i'll put it here as well

Personally as this package seems to just ship binaries rather then libraries, personally I think it would be better called "esptool" unless there is already an esptool available in another language. I'd also put it in either then electronics or hardware given that by your definition this seems to be "microcontroller tools" rather then a python library.

I would also only ship the python3 version, having a python 2 and python 3 version of the same binary in the repo's doesn't really make sense. If it was a library other python2 applications may still use then maybe. However using singlespec will still make your life easier when we migrate to another python version or interpreter.

Andreas Färber (a_faerber) - about 6 years ago

author source maintainer

Responded on the list: This package follows the Python packaging guidelines on the openSUSE Wiki, including how to package Singlespec executables. python-rpm-macros says: "Packages adhering to the SUSE Python module naming policy are usually called %{flavor}-%{modname}. In some cases, it is only %{modname} though."

---

Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) - about 6 years ago

reviewer

Make a %package -n esptool then.

I already found exiftool living in perl-Image-ExifTool a bit weird.