This request supersedes:
request 514819
(Show diff)
Overview
Request 515259 accepted
No description set
- Created by cornelisbb
- In state accepted
- Supersedes 514819
Loading...
Request History
cornelisbb created request
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto added factory-repo-checker as a reviewer
Please review build success
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
staging-bot added as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:153"
staging-bot accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:153
factory-repo-checker accepted review
Builds for repo KDE:Extra/openSUSE_Tumbleweed
licensedigger accepted review
ok
dimstar accepted review
staging-bot accepted review
ready to accept
staging-bot approved review
ready to accept
dimstar_suse accepted request
Accept to openSUSE:Factory
+#Source0: https://github.com/CDrummond/cantata/archive/v%{version}.tar.gz +Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gzAny reason we can't use the full RUL for the source? is there a difference between the tarball used and the one published? which one? why?
The name is different. Based on the URL a name v%{version}.tar.gz is expected, but a package with the name cantata-%{version}.tar.gz is actually downloaded when that URL is used.