Overview
Why is openSUSE-appstream-1.0/LICENSE GPL-2.0+ where the spec file license is MIT?
Where? (.spec: "The license for this file, and modifications and additions to the
file, is the same license as for the pristine package itself")
Also, if the .spec has a separate license that's usually not a problem…
Request History
Zaitor created request
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto added factory-repo-checker as a reviewer
Please review build success
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
Output of check script (non-fatal):
Unknown license 'MIT AND CC0-1.0'
factory-repo-checker reopened review
libzypp-plugin-appdata is still building for repository openSUSE_Factory
staging-bot set openSUSE:Factory:Staging:B as a staging project
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:B"
staging-bot accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:B
factory-repo-checker accepted review
Builds for repo openSUSE:Factory:Staging:B/standard
dimstar_suse changed priority to moderate => important
raising priority for openSUSE:Factory:Staging:B
babelworx accepted review
alarrosa accepted review
ok
dimstar_suse accepted review
ready to accept
dimstar_suse approved review
ready to accept
dimstar_suse accepted request
Accept to openSUSE:Factory
