Overview
Request History
favogt created request
factory-auto added opensuse-review-team as a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto added factory-repo-checker as a reviewer
Please review build success
factory-auto accepted review
Check script succeeded
licensedigger added legal-team as a reviewer
new_package: 1.5.3
licensedigger accepted review
dimstar_suse added openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:1 as a reviewer
Being evaluated by staging project "openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:1"
dimstar_suse accepted review
Picked openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:1
dimstar accepted review
factory-repo-checker accepted review
Builds for repo openSUSE:Factory:Staging:adi:1/standard
babelworx declined review
Package declared GPL-2.0+ but contains multiple GPL-3.0+ files (thermal-monitor) as well as GPL-2.0 ("only") files - e.g. src/thd_rapl_interface.cpp. GPL-2.0 and GPL-3.0 are not compatible. The GPL-3.0 issue may possibly be avoided by using License: GPL-2.0+ and GPL-3.0+ (but that doesn't solve the GPL-2.0 issue) but only if the GPL-3.0 files are compiled into a binary component that doesn't interact with the GPL-2.0 component in a manner in which a derived work is created.
babelworx declined request
Package declared GPL-2.0+ but contains multiple GPL-3.0+ files (thermal-monitor) as well as GPL-2.0 ("only") files - e.g. src/thd_rapl_interface.cpp. GPL-2.0 and GPL-3.0 are not compatible. The GPL-3.0 issue may possibly be avoided by using License: GPL-2.0+ and GPL-3.0+ (but that doesn't solve the GPL-2.0 issue) but only if the GPL-3.0 files are compiled into a binary component that doesn't interact with the GPL-2.0 component in a manner in which a derived work is created.
favogt reopened request
babelworks: AFAIK, the %license field is for the binary package.
thermal_monitor is not built by this spec file and does not end up in the RPM.
babelworx accepted review
mlin7442 accepted review
ready to accept
mlin7442 approved review
ready to accept
dimstar_suse accepted request
Accept to openSUSE:Factory
