Overview
Request 156408 superseded
Reintroduce gtkglext.. some 'legact' 3rd party 'crap-ware' seems to rely on this being available... seen several similar issues. Please also add to 12.3 - We made it build with gnome 3.6 (pangox drop)
- Created by dimstar
- In state superseded
- Superseded by 156468
Request History
dimstar created request
Reintroduce gtkglext.. some 'legact' 3rd party 'crap-ware' seems to rely on this being available... seen several similar issues. Please also add to 12.3 - We made it build with gnome 3.6 (pangox drop)
licensedigger added a reviewer
{"delegate": "new package r>3"}
licensedigger accepted review
{"delegate": "new package r>3"}
factory-auto added a reviewer
Please review sources
factory-auto accepted review
Builds for repo openSUSE_Factory
a_jaeger accepted review
ok
babelworx declined request
There are a significant number of LGPL-2.1 files in the package and very few GPL-2.0 licensed files. Please recheck the package to see if the GPL-2.0 files (examples) can be relocated to a subpackage. By way of example, the Fedora spec file for the package does have various subpackage, most of which are LGPL-2.1 licensed (with one GPL-2.0 match)
babelworx declined review
There are a significant number of LGPL-2.1 files in the package and very few GPL-2.0 licensed files. Please recheck the package to see if the GPL-2.0 files (examples) can be relocated to a subpackage. By way of example, the Fedora spec file for the package does have various subpackage, most of which are LGPL-2.1 licensed (with one GPL-2.0 match)
superseded by 156468