it would - but if it's halfway as messy as crash (where the definition was not exactly the same as in glibc) - or the crashes seen in rsync - I preferred to go the 'lazy' route and simply rename it before (considering upstream does not really work on this, I was not willing to risk bug reports :) )
Wouldn't it be much easier to simply drop the internal implementation?
it would - but if it's halfway as messy as crash (where the definition was not exactly the same as in glibc) - or the crashes seen in rsync - I preferred to go the 'lazy' route and simply rename it before (considering upstream does not really work on this, I was not willing to risk bug reports :) )