Overview
Request 1076658 accepted
- Update to 3.5.0:
way too many to be listed here, check:
https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Reference/Release_Notes/3.5
https://www.blender.org/download/releases/3-5/
- Removed Add_missing_iostream_header.patch, applied upstream
- Add blender-addons and blender-addons-contrib by _service
- Created by frispete
- In state accepted
- 4 package maintainers
-
Open review for
StefanBruens
-
Open review for
frispete
Request History
frispete created request
- Update to 3.5.0:
way too many to be listed here, check:
https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Reference/Release_Notes/3.5
https://www.blender.org/download/releases/3-5/
- Removed Add_missing_iostream_header.patch, applied upstream
- Add blender-addons and blender-addons-contrib by _service
darix accepted review
looks good but i wonder if we should move addons and addons-contrib into subpackages.
frispete accepted request
Let's not further delay this update..
I will come back to package separation later on!
https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender-addons/archive/v3.5.0.tar.gz
+1 for packaging the addons separately (not even as subpackages, but a completely separate package). As the addons are noarch, and have hardly any build time depedencies we get smaller packages and less frequent updates (i.e. no rebuild due to changing dependencies).
OTOH, we need a hard runtime dependency then, for addons at least. A Blender session throws errors otherwise...
I'm on the way into my holidays right now.
What about accepting this for now, and I will prepare a follow-up split submit in the next weeks, if nobody beats me before!
@StefanBruens, @darix, @frispete, @ideasman42: review reminder