This request supersedes:
request 1029976
(Show diff)
Overview
Request 1029995 accepted
- Implement python packaging best practices:
* Don't catchall python sitelib
- Don't install toplevel test module
- Make sure the correct version metadata is installed
* Enable testsuite
- Add missing update-alternatives requirements
- Created by bnavigator
- In state accepted
- Supersedes 1029976
Loading...
Request History
bnavigator created request
- Implement python packaging best practices:
* Don't catchall python sitelib
- Don't install toplevel test module
- Make sure the correct version metadata is installed
* Enable testsuite
- Add missing update-alternatives requirements
mcepl accepted request
%exclude %{python_sitelib}/testReally, more as a question than a complaint? Why not
rm -rf %{$python_sitelib}/test?Same effect. Except that an upstream update fixing it would create an error message in the
%excludevariant, while therm -rfvariant would possibly remain in the specfile forever because no one notices that it is not necessary anymoreThen it could
rm -r ..., but whatever.Also, did you file that issue upstream?