google-noto-fonts
No description set
- Developed at M17N:fonts
- Sources inherited from project openSUSE:Factory
-
2
derived packages
- Download package
-
Checkout Package
osc -A https://api.opensuse.org checkout openSUSE:Leap:15.0:Staging:FactoryCandidates/google-noto-fonts && cd $_ - Create Badge
Refresh
Refresh
Source Files
| Filename | Size | Changed |
|---|---|---|
| Noto-hinted.zip | 0500352958 477 MB | |
| _constraints | 0000000109 109 Bytes | |
| generate-specfile.sh | 0000003545 3.46 KB | |
| google-noto-fonts.changes | 0000005024 4.91 KB | |
| google-noto-fonts.spec | 0000080134 78.3 KB | |
| google-noto-fonts.spec.in | 0000002015 1.97 KB |
Revision 16 (latest revision is 30)
Dominique Leuenberger (dimstar_suse)
accepted
request 492903
from
Factory Maintainer (factory-maintainer)
(revision 16)
Automatic submission by obs-autosubmit
Comments 4
Should this package be named as "noto-fonts"? Because all its sub-packages are prefiexed with noto- rather than google-noto-
Most font packages are prefixed with the name of the vendor/group/foundry. https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Fonts#Naming_and_Central_Font_Repository
If it should be prefixed with google-noto-, then all sub-packages should have the same prefix. It is a problem of inconsistent naming.
I would agree.