google-noto-fonts
No description set
- Developed at M17N:fonts
- Sources inherited from project openSUSE:Factory
-
2
derived packages
- Download package
-
Checkout Package
osc -A https://api.opensuse.org checkout openSUSE:Factory:PowerPC/google-noto-fonts && cd $_ - Create Badge
Refresh
Refresh
Source Files
| Filename | Size | Changed |
|---|---|---|
| LICENSE | 0000004377 4.27 KB | |
| _constraints | 0000000109 109 Bytes | |
| generate-fonts-and-specfile.sh | 0000004827 4.71 KB | |
| google-noto-fonts.changes | 0000008759 8.55 KB | |
| google-noto-fonts.spec | 0000160410 157 KB | |
| google-noto-fonts.spec.in | 0000002573 2.51 KB | |
| ttf.tar.gz | 0247038182 236 MB |
Revision 24 (latest revision is 30)
Dominique Leuenberger (dimstar_suse)
accepted
request 982913
from
Gordon Leung (Pi-Cla)
(revision 24)
feat: create new metapackage noto-fonts with all Noto Fonts except CJK and Emoji update: 20220524 -> 20220607 - Noto Sans and Noto Sans Myanmar have been updated fix(spec): add LICENSE to every package, remove redundant doc package - It is likely a legal requirement that the license must be included with the package (rather than only recommends) - Using the %license macro and including the license in every subpackage is the norm fix(sh): prevent redundant .svn files from being compressed into archive chore(spec): use install instead of mkdir and cp chore(sh): fix typo
Comments 4
Should this package be named as "noto-fonts"? Because all its sub-packages are prefiexed with noto- rather than google-noto-
Most font packages are prefixed with the name of the vendor/group/foundry. https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Fonts#Naming_and_Central_Font_Repository
If it should be prefixed with google-noto-, then all sub-packages should have the same prefix. It is a problem of inconsistent naming.
I would agree.