Overview Repositories Revisions Requests Users Attributes Meta

google-noto-fonts

Edit Package google-noto-fonts
No description set
  • Developed at M17N:fonts
  • Sources inherited from project openSUSE:Factory
  • 2 derived packages
  • Download package
  • osc -A https://api.opensuse.org checkout openSUSE:Factory:PowerPC/google-noto-fonts && cd $_
  • Create Badge
Refresh
Refresh
Source Files
Filename Size Changed
Noto-hinted.zip 1159948133 1.08 GB
_constraints 0000000109 109 Bytes
generate-specfile.sh 0000003621 3.54 KB
google-noto-fonts.changes 0000006186 6.04 KB
google-noto-fonts.spec 0000088790 86.7 KB
google-noto-fonts.spec.in 0000002050 2 KB
Revision 20 (latest revision is 30)
Dominique Leuenberger's avatar Dominique Leuenberger (dimstar_suse) accepted request 708818 from Marguerite Su's avatar Marguerite Su (MargueriteSu) (revision 20) 
- Separate Noto Color Emoji and Noto Emoji fonts into a new project
  due to their different release cycle
- Fix the direct changes to spec file at the previous commit
Comments 4
Yunhe Guo's avatar
Yunhe Guo (guoyunhebrave) -

Should this package be named as "noto-fonts"? Because all its sub-packages are prefiexed with noto- rather than google-noto-

Jan Engelhardt's avatar
Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) -

Most font packages are prefixed with the name of the vendor/group/foundry. https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Fonts#Naming_and_Central_Font_Repository

Yunhe Guo's avatar
Yunhe Guo (guoyunhebrave) -

If it should be prefixed with google-noto-, then all sub-packages should have the same prefix. It is a problem of inconsistent naming.

Jan Engelhardt's avatar
Jan Engelhardt (jengelh) -

I would agree.

openSUSE Build Service is sponsored by
Places