google-noto-fonts
No description set
- Developed at M17N:fonts
- Sources inherited from project openSUSE:Factory
-
2
derived packages
- Download package
-
Checkout Package
osc -A https://api.opensuse.org checkout home:seife:Factory/google-noto-fonts && cd $_
- Create Badge
Refresh
Refresh
Source Files
Filename | Size | Changed |
---|---|---|
Noto-hinted.zip | 1159948133 1.08 GB | |
_constraints | 0000000109 109 Bytes | |
generate-specfile.sh | 0000003621 3.54 KB | |
google-noto-fonts.changes | 0000006186 6.04 KB | |
google-noto-fonts.spec | 0000088790 86.7 KB | |
google-noto-fonts.spec.in | 0000002050 2 KB |
Revision 20 (latest revision is 30)
Dominique Leuenberger (dimstar_suse)
accepted
request 708818
from
Marguerite Su (MargueriteSu)
(revision 20)
- Separate Noto Color Emoji and Noto Emoji fonts into a new project due to their different release cycle - Fix the direct changes to spec file at the previous commit
Comments 4
Should this package be named as "noto-fonts"? Because all its sub-packages are prefiexed with noto- rather than google-noto-
Most font packages are prefixed with the name of the vendor/group/foundry. https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Fonts#Naming_and_Central_Font_Repository
If it should be prefixed with google-noto-, then all sub-packages should have the same prefix. It is a problem of inconsistent naming.
I would agree.