google-noto-fonts
No description set
- Developed at M17N:fonts
- Sources inherited from project openSUSE:Factory
-
2
derived packages
- Download package
-
Checkout Package
osc -A https://api.opensuse.org checkout devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:ILP32/google-noto-fonts && cd $_
- Create Badge
Refresh
Refresh
Source Files
Filename | Size | Changed |
---|---|---|
Noto-hinted.zip | 0380364279 363 MB | |
generate-specfile.sh | 0000002664 2.6 KB | |
google-noto-fonts.changes | 0000001194 1.17 KB | |
google-noto-fonts.spec | 0000051095 49.9 KB | |
google-noto-fonts.spec.in | 0000001826 1.78 KB |
Revision 6 (latest revision is 30)
Stephan Kulow (coolo)
accepted
request 327155
from
Petr Gajdos (pgajdos)
(revision 6)
- update to version 20150618: + Noto CJK variants + Thaana Sans, Tibetan variants. + update generate-specfile.sh + update url. (forwarded request 327151 from fcrozat)
Comments 4
Should this package be named as "noto-fonts"? Because all its sub-packages are prefiexed with noto- rather than google-noto-
Most font packages are prefixed with the name of the vendor/group/foundry. https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Fonts#Naming_and_Central_Font_Repository
If it should be prefixed with google-noto-, then all sub-packages should have the same prefix. It is a problem of inconsistent naming.
I would agree.