File 60af933d-x86-gcc11-hypervisor-build.patch of Package xen.19912

Overview Repositories Revisions Requests Users Attributes Meta

File 60af933d-x86-gcc11-hypervisor-build.patch of Package xen.19912

References: bsc#1181921

# Commit 722f59d38c710a940ab05e542a83020eb5546dea
# Date 2021-05-27 14:40:29 +0200
# Author Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
# Committer Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
x86: make hypervisor build with gcc11

Gcc 11 looks to make incorrect assumptions about valid ranges that
pointers may be used for addressing when they are derived from e.g. a
plain constant. See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100680.

Utilize RELOC_HIDE() to work around the issue, which for x86 manifests
in at least
- mpparse.c:efi_check_config(),
- tboot.c:tboot_probe(),
- tboot.c:tboot_gen_frametable_integrity(),
- x86_emulate.c:x86_emulate() (at -O2 only).
The last case is particularly odd not just because it only triggers at
higher optimization levels, but also because it only affects one of at
least three similar constructs. Various "note" diagnostics claim the
valid index range to be [0, 2⁶³-1].

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Tested-by: Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>

--- a/tools/tests/x86_emulator/x86-emulate.c
+++ b/tools/tests/x86_emulator/x86-emulate.c
@@ -8,6 +8,13 @@
 
 #define ERR_PTR(val) NULL
 
+/* See gcc bug 100680, but here don't bother making this version dependent. */
+#define gcc11_wrap(x) ({                  \
+    unsigned long x_;                     \
+    __asm__ ( "" : "=g" (x_) : "0" (x) ); \
+    (typeof(x))x_;                        \
+})
+
 #define cpu_has_amd_erratum(nr) 0
 #define cpu_has_mpx false
 #define read_bndcfgu() 0
--- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
@@ -725,7 +725,7 @@ union vex {
 #define copy_VEX(ptr, vex) ({ \
     if ( !mode_64bit() ) \
         (vex).reg |= 8; \
-    (ptr)[0 - PFX_BYTES] = ext < ext_8f08 ? 0xc4 : 0x8f; \
+    gcc11_wrap(ptr)[0 - PFX_BYTES] = ext < ext_8f08 ? 0xc4 : 0x8f; \
     (ptr)[1 - PFX_BYTES] = (vex).raw[0]; \
     (ptr)[2 - PFX_BYTES] = (vex).raw[1]; \
     container_of((ptr) + 1 - PFX_BYTES, typeof(vex), raw[0]); \
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/fixmap.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/fixmap.h
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ extern void __set_fixmap(
 
 #define clear_fixmap(idx) __set_fixmap(idx, 0, 0)
 
-#define __fix_to_virt(x) (FIXADDR_TOP - ((x) << PAGE_SHIFT))
+#define __fix_to_virt(x) gcc11_wrap(FIXADDR_TOP - ((x) << PAGE_SHIFT))
 #define __virt_to_fix(x) ((FIXADDR_TOP - ((x)&PAGE_MASK)) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
 
 #define fix_to_virt(x)   ((void *)__fix_to_virt(x))
--- a/xen/include/xen/compiler.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/compiler.h
@@ -105,6 +105,12 @@
     __asm__ ("" : "=r"(__ptr) : "0"(ptr));      \
     (typeof(ptr)) (__ptr + (off)); })
 
+#if CONFIG_GCC_VERSION >= 110000 /* See gcc bug 100680. */
+# define gcc11_wrap(x) RELOC_HIDE(x, 0)
+#else
+# define gcc11_wrap(x) (x)
+#endif
+
 #ifdef __GCC_ASM_FLAG_OUTPUTS__
 # define ASM_FLAG_OUT(yes, no) yes
 #else
--- a/xen/include/xen/pdx.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/pdx.h
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ extern u64 pdx_region_mask(u64 base, u64
 extern void set_pdx_range(unsigned long smfn, unsigned long emfn);
 
 #define page_to_pdx(pg)  ((pg) - frame_table)
-#define pdx_to_page(pdx) (frame_table + (pdx))
+#define pdx_to_page(pdx) gcc11_wrap(frame_table + (pdx))
 
 bool __mfn_valid(unsigned long mfn);

Places

File 60af933d-x86-gcc11-hypervisor-build.patch of Package xen.19912

Places