File aspell-mail.txt of Package apache-commons-codec

Overview Repositories Revisions Requests Users Attributes Meta

File aspell-mail.txt of Package apache-commons-codec (Revision ba5711eae033e28ad40027015f83fb14)

Currently displaying revision ba5711eae033e28ad40027015f83fb14 , Show latest

Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:37:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Kevin Atkinson <k@kevina.org>
To: Tomas Radej <tradej@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Aspell results licensing
In-Reply-To: <20120821095056.266cfca47594ad0e03f332f8@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1208211423550.7113@misc.kevina.org>
References: <20120816110627.3b433e1e1a2cfa2a3c29f8e2@redhat.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1208162006450.14875@misc.kevina.org> <20120821095056.266cfca47594ad0e03f332f8@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

How's this:

Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute and sell the file
   batch0.tab (available at http://aspell.net/test/cur/) is hereby
   granted without fee, provided that the above copyright notice appears
   in all copies and that both that copyright notice and this permission
   notice appear in supporting documentation. Kevin Atkinson makes no
   representations about the suitability of this array for any
   purpose. It is provided "as is" without express or implied warranty.

2007 since that is the year I belive I last modified the data.  Would 2012 be 
better?

On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Tomas Radej wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:12:27 +0200 (CEST)
> Kevin Atkinson <kevina@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> If you are using the results than there shouldn't be a problem regardless of
>> what copyright I use.
>
> It's necessary to say that I'm not a maintainer in that project, I
> simply package it into Fedora.
>
>> If the original data file will some how be distributed
>> please let me know what your requirements are and I will see about
>> explicitly
>> assigning a compatible copyright.
>
> While checking the package, I found out that some of the data are
> actually embedded in the code [1], so yes, your data is actually being
> distributed. If I may, I would suggest you use either the MIT/X11
> licence or the 2 or 3 clause BSD licence, as both of these can be
> combined with both the ASL 2.0 licence and GPL v2+ [2].
>
> Thank you, TR
>
> [1]
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/codec/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/codec/language/DoubleMetaphoneTest.java?view=markup
> ,
> line 49 onwards
>
> [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses
>
> -- 
> Tomas Radej <tradej@redhat.com>
>
>

Places

File aspell-mail.txt of Package apache-commons-codec (Revision ba5711eae033e28ad40027015f83fb14)

Places