Sign Up
Log In
Log In
or
Sign Up
Places
All Projects
Status Monitor
Collapse sidebar
DISCONTINUED:openSUSE:11.1:Update
cross-ppc64-gcc-icecream-backend
pr36822.diff
Overview
Repositories
Revisions
Requests
Users
Attributes
Meta
File pr36822.diff of Package cross-ppc64-gcc-icecream-backend
From gcc-patches-return-222581-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc dot gnu dot org at gcc dot gnu dot org Thu Jul 17 13:26:59 2008 Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-222581-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc dot gnu dot org at gcc dot gnu dot org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org Received: (qmail 6018 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2008 13:26:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 6009 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jul 2008 13:26:58 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate2.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate2.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.151) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:26:36 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate2.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6HDQDBh031310 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:26:13 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.0) with ESMTP id m6HDQCxe1204464 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:26:12 +0200 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m6HDQCvp021794 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:26:12 +0200 Received: from lc4eb0107015440.ibm.com (dyn-9-152-216-65.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.216.65]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id m6HDQB7A021766 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:26:11 +0200 Received: by lc4eb0107015440.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:26:11 +0200 From: "Andreas Krebbel" <Andreas dot Krebbel at de dot ibm dot com> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:26:11 +0200 To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org Subject: [PATCH] PR36822 recog: Reorder extra memory constraint checks for inline assemblies Message-ID: <20080717132611.GA27503@homer.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help at gcc dot gnu dot org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help at gcc dot gnu dot org> Sender: gcc-patches-owner at gcc dot gnu dot org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org Hello, in order to get the best out of reload a back end might want to define the most generic extra memory constraint to actually accept more than the addresses accepted by GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS and the 'm' constraint. The reason for this is the way reload performs modifications in the RTL stream. It first just records the changes for an insn in separated data structures without actually changing the INSN. After a reload for a part of an address has been pushed. An extra memory constraints still might get evaluated for the original address (which has already been fixed at this point). Unfortunately the fix is not visible to the back end (without using find_replacement hacks). So e.g. the 'R' constraint on S/390 basically accepts everything wrapped into a MEM rtx although the documentation says that it only accepts base+index+12bit displacement. Performance measurements have proven that a stricter check here has a negative impact which is caused by worse exploitation of the address formats. This usually doesn't hurt since reload fixes all addresses not passing GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS before looking at any constraints. While recognizing "normal" INSN patterns the predicate would make sure that adresses do at least pass GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS. But this does not happen for inline assemblies. If a back end defines an extra memory constraint more general than GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS optimizers like combine feel free to build arbitrarily complex MEM RTXs into asm parameters which even reload is not able to fix. In order to prevent this recog should make sure that when matching an extra memory constraint for an inline assembly that the parameter at least passes the most generic checks for memory and address operands. This somewhat limits the creativity of combine in those cases. The attached patch just changes the order of the existing checks in asm_operand_ok in order to make sure that we don't accept arbitrary RTXs just because the back end says its ok for a certain extra memory constraint. For extra memory constraint we only have to make sure that the address can be handled by reload. Everything that passes memory_operand or address_operand should be ok then. Boostrapped on x86_64, s390 and s390x. This fixes the included testcase on s390x. OK for mainline? Bye, -Andreas- 2008-07-17 Andreas Krebbel <krebbel1@de.ibm.com> PR target/36822 * recog.c (asm_operand_ok): Change the order of the extra memory constraint checks. 2008-07-17 Andreas Krebbel <krebbel1@de.ibm.com> PR target/36822 * gcc.target/s390/pr36822.c: New testcase. Index: gcc/recog.c =================================================================== *** gcc/recog.c.orig 2008-07-16 16:55:35.000000000 +0200 --- gcc/recog.c 2008-07-17 08:20:58.000000000 +0200 *************** asm_operand_ok (rtx op, const char *cons *** 1686,1701 **** result = 1; } #ifdef EXTRA_CONSTRAINT_STR else if (EXTRA_CONSTRAINT_STR (op, c, constraint)) result = 1; - else if (EXTRA_MEMORY_CONSTRAINT (c, constraint) - /* Every memory operand can be reloaded to fit. */ - && memory_operand (op, VOIDmode)) - result = 1; - else if (EXTRA_ADDRESS_CONSTRAINT (c, constraint) - /* Every address operand can be reloaded to fit. */ - && address_operand (op, VOIDmode)) - result = 1; #endif break; } --- 1686,1699 ---- result = 1; } #ifdef EXTRA_CONSTRAINT_STR + else if (EXTRA_MEMORY_CONSTRAINT (c, constraint)) + /* Every memory operand can be reloaded to fit. */ + result = result || memory_operand (op, VOIDmode); + else if (EXTRA_ADDRESS_CONSTRAINT (c, constraint)) + /* Every address operand can be reloaded to fit. */ + result = result || address_operand (op, VOIDmode); else if (EXTRA_CONSTRAINT_STR (op, c, constraint)) result = 1; #endif break; } Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr36822.c =================================================================== *** /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000 --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr36822.c 2008-07-17 08:20:58.000000000 +0200 *************** *** 0 **** --- 1,16 ---- + /* This used to ICE on s390 due to bug in the definition of the 'R' + constraint which replaced the 'm' constraint (together with 'T') + while adding z10 support. */ + + /* { dg-do compile } */ + /* { dg-options "-O" } */ + + int boo() + { + struct { + unsigned char pad[4096]; + unsigned long long bar; + } *foo; + asm volatile( "" : "=m" (*(unsigned long long*)(foo->bar)) + : "a" (&foo->bar)); + }
Locations
Projects
Search
Status Monitor
Help
OpenBuildService.org
Documentation
API Documentation
Code of Conduct
Contact
Support
@OBShq
Terms
openSUSE Build Service is sponsored by
The Open Build Service is an
openSUSE project
.
Sign Up
Log In
Places
Places
All Projects
Status Monitor
