Files could not be expanded: conflict in file google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts.spec

google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts

Edit Package google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts
No description set
Refresh
Refresh
Source Files

Sources could not be expanded: conflict in file google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts.spec

Show unmerged sources

Comments 4

Dirk Stoecker's avatar

Hmm, why are e.g. all files from NotoSansCJKsc-hinted.zip missing: 17324316 2015-06-15 14:49 NotoSansCJKsc-Black.otf 16983244 2015-06-15 14:49 NotoSansCJKsc-Bold.otf 16353108 2015-06-15 14:49 NotoSansCJKsc-DemiLight.otf 16229132 2015-06-15 14:49 NotoSansCJKsc-Light.otf 16489616 2015-06-15 14:49 NotoSansCJKsc-Medium.otf 16412332 2015-06-15 14:49 NotoSansCJKsc-Regular.otf 15139396 2015-06-15 14:49 NotoSansCJKsc-Thin.otf 16983620 2015-06-15 14:49 NotoSansMonoCJKsc-Bold.otf 16412712 2015-06-15 14:49 NotoSansMonoCJKsc-Regular.otf


Jan Engelhardt's avatar

are you sure those aren't duplicates?


Dirk Stoecker's avatar

At least OSM requests the "CJK JP" and not the "JP" and the japanese characters look bad in the map, so I'd say no, they aren't duplicates.


Marguerite Su's avatar
  1. CJK JP is a combination of the four: JP SC TC KR. CJK SC consists these four too, but displays chars using SC glyph flavor. That’s what Google says. One font for four langs

But you know what, that advanced technology doesn’t work under Linux. So every such CJK font displays chars using JP flavor because J is the first.

  1. If you say the JPs in CJK JP and JP are different, that will be a false alarm because they’re identically the same. You should check other area for a successful blame:-)
openSUSE Build Service is sponsored by