baserev update by copy to link target

• Files Changed
• Browse Source

update to latest version

• Files Changed
• Browse Source

baserev update by copy to link target

• Files Changed
• Browse Source

update to latest version

• Files Changed
• Browse Source

baserev update by copy to link target

• Files Changed
• Browse Source

baserev update by copy to link target

• Files Changed
• Browse Source

- test presence of python2 (not just if it is skipped; two different
  things now, unfortunately)

• Files Changed
• Browse Source

update to latest version

• Files Changed
• Browse Source

baserev update by copy to link target

• Files Changed
• Browse Source

update to latest version

• Files Changed
• Browse Source

baserev update by copy to link target

• Files Changed
• Browse Source

- Handle cases where python2 is disabled 
  (needed for SLE backports compatibility)

• Files Changed
• Browse Source

baserev update by copy to link target

• Files Changed
• Browse Source

• Files Changed
• Browse Source

- uninstall alternatives in %postun

• Files Changed
• Browse Source

baserev update by copy to link target

• Files Changed
• Browse Source

- update for singlespec
- update to 4.3.4:
  - Using the --skip-covered option on an HTML report with 100% coverage would
    cause a “No data to report” error, as reported in issue 549. This is now
    fixed; thanks, Loïc Dachary.
  - If-statements can be optimized away during compilation, for example, if 0:
    or if __debug__:. Coverage.py had problems properly understanding these
    statements which existed in the source, but not in the compiled bytecode.
    This problem, reported in issue 522, is now fixed.
  - If you specified --source as a directory, then coverage.py would look for
    importable Python files in that directory, and could identify ones that had
    never been executed at all. But if you specified it as a package name, that
    detection wasn’t performed. Now it is, closing issue 426. Thanks to Loïc
    Dachary for the fix.
  - If you started and stopped coverage measurement thousands of times in your
    process, you could crash Python with a “Fatal Python error: deallocating
    None” error. This is now fixed. Thanks to Alex Groce for the bug report.
  - On PyPy, measuring coverage in subprocesses could produce a warning: “Trace
    function changed, measurement is likely wrong: None”. This was spurious,
    and has been suppressed.
  - Previously, coverage.py couldn’t start on Jython, due to that
    implementation missing the multiprocessing module (issue 551). This problem
    has now been fixed. Also, issue 322 about not being able to invoke coverage
    conveniently, seems much better: jython -m coverage run myprog.py works
    properly.
  - Let’s say you ran the HTML report over and over again in the same output
    directory, with --skip-covered. And imagine due to your heroic test-writing
    efforts, a file just acheived the goal of 100% coverage. With coverage.py
    4.3, the old HTML file with the less-than-100% coverage would be left
    behind. This file is now properly deleted.

• Files Changed
• Browse Source

baserev update by copy to link target

• Files Changed
• Browse Source

- update to Version 4.3.1 — 2016-12-28:
  - Some environments couldn’t install 4.3, as described in issue 540. This is
    now fixed.
  - The check for conflicting --source and --include was too simple in a few
    different ways, breaking a few perfectly reasonable use cases, described in
    issue 541. The check has been reverted while we re-think the fix for issue 265.
- update to Version 4.3 — 2016-12-27:
  Special thanks to Loïc Dachary, who took an extraordinary interest in
  coverage.py and contributed a number of improvements in this release.
  - The HTML report now supports a --skip-covered option like the other
    reporting commands. Thanks, Loïc Dachary for the implementation, closing
    issue 433.
  - Subprocesses that are measured with automatic subprocess measurement used
    to read in any pre-existing data file. This meant data would be incorrectly
    carried forward from run to run. Now those files are not read, so each
    subprocess only writes its own data. Fixes issue 510.
  - Coverage.py wouldn’t execute sys.excepthook when an exception happened in
    your program. Now it does, thanks to Andrew Hoos. Closes issue 535.
  - The coverage combine command will now fail if there are no data files to
    combine. The combine changes in 4.2 meant that multiple combines could lose
    data, leaving you with an empty .coverage data file. Fixes issues issue 525,
    issue 412, issue 516, and probably issue 511.
  - The branch coverage issues described in issue 493, issue 496, and issue 502
    are now fixed, thanks to Loïc Dachary.
  - Options can now be read from a tox.ini file, if any. Like setup.cfg,
    sections are prefixed with “coverage:”, so [run] options will be read from
    the [coverage:run] section of tox.ini. Implements part of issue 519. Thanks,
    Stephen Finucane.
  - Specifying both --source and --include no longer silently ignores the
    include setting, instead it fails with a message. Thanks, Nathan Land and

• Files Changed
• Browse Source

- update to 4.2:
  - Since ``concurrency=multiprocessing`` uses subprocesses, options specified on
    the coverage.py command line will not be communicated down to them.  Only
    options in the configuration file will apply to the subprocesses.
    Previously, the options didn't apply to the subprocesses, but there was no
    indication.  Now it is an error to use ``--concurrency=multiprocessing`` and
    other run-affecting options on the command line.  This prevents
    failures like those reported in `issue 495`_.
  - Filtering the HTML report is now faster, thanks to Ville Skyttä.

• Files Changed
• Browse Source